Latest topics
» Watch This Space, more info coming.by The Lazy Rosarian 21st September 2018, 06:25
» A Rose by any other name ...
by The Lazy Rosarian 17th September 2018, 19:26
» Looking for "St Brigid's Rose"
by The Lazy Rosarian 11th August 2018, 06:50
» And for David while he is away.
by neptune 19th July 2018, 23:57
» Wanting to talk with old roserian friends again, and new roserians friends too !
by rosemeadowtasmania 14th July 2018, 22:54
» Premature Petal dropping- Perth
by rosemeadowtasmania 5th July 2018, 15:27
» Vale: Meryl Constance
by rosemeadowtasmania 5th July 2018, 13:55
» Newbie to roses and forums for that matter!
by Steph 28th June 2018, 09:39
for simon
Page 1 of 1
Re: for simon
This is why roses with very large numbers of petals often have no stamens. But don't ignore the really double ones altogether. The absence of stamens can be a blessing in disguise for a hybridiser. If the stigma are viable then the absence of stamens can almost guarantee hybridity. have a look on page 197 at the account in the top right corner of how 'Maman Cochet' became the seed parent of 'William R. Smith'. It's the same reason so even though a rose might be super double with no stamens or functional stigma can become temporarily receptive.
Re: for simon
Great book hey! Did you see the white 'Lady Hillingdon' seedling... see what I mean about thick petals.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|